Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm still not sold on __args__ == (Tuple[int, int], str); it looks too weird. However if we introduced a new private type for this purpose that might work? I see that the definition of Tuple in typing.py is Tuple = _TupleType(tuple, -1, inst=False, name='Tuple') Maybe we could do something like _PosArgs = _TupleType(tuple, -1, inst=False, name='_PosArgs') ? Then __args__ could be (_PosArgs[int, int], str). However this still leaves collections.abc.Callable different. (We really don't want to import typing there.) Then again, maybe we should still not rule out ((int, int), str)? It feels less hackish than the others. And yet another solution would be to stick with (int, int, str) and change collections.abc.Callable to match that. Simple, and more backward compatible for users of the typing module (since no changes at all there). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42195> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
