Dennis Sweeney <sweeney.dennis...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Why not just fix bogus_code_obj.py? Something like this (using the replace method) would make it more future-proof to similar changes in the code object constructor signature (and be more readable!): import dis POP_TOP = dis.opmap['POP_TOP'] wordcode = bytes([POP_TOP, 0] * 10) f = lambda: None f.__code__ = f.__code__.replace(co_code=wordcode) f() ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42422> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
