Erlend Egeberg Aasland <erlend.aasl...@innova.no> added the comment:

> I don't see any reason to merge GH-24135 if we are going to remove cache.[ch] 
> in this issue.

Yes, I've thought about that myself. A small argument pro merging GH-24135 
would be that if we for some reason decide to revert this change, then 
cache.[ch] would still be prepared for module state (which is needed for 
multi-phase init).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42862>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to