Collin Winter <coll...@gmail.com> added the comment: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Antoine Pitrou <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > > Hello Collin, > > Thanks for taking a look. > >> I don't see the changes to the lnotab format being a roadblock; just >> mention it in NEWS. Likewise, the pure-Python compiler package shouldn't >> be a high priority; your changes to that package look good enough. > > Well, I have good news: the fixes to the pure Python compiler have been > accepted and committed by Neil Schemenauer in r69373.
Yeah, I saw that. Fantastic. >> I'm seeing encouraging speed-ups out of this (with gcc 4.3.1 x86_64, >> compiling Python as 64-bit): >> Django templates (render a 150x150 table 100 times): >> Min: 0.595 -> 0.589: 0.94% faster >> Avg: 0.599 -> 0.591: 1.30% faster >> >> Spitfire templates (render a 1000x1000 table 100 times): >> Min: 0.751 -> 0.729: 2.98% faster >> Avg: 0.753 -> 0.730: 3.09% faster > > Not a tremendous speedup but not totally insignificant either. > (I see you like Spitfire :-)) Well, Spitfire and Django represent very different ways of implementing a template system, so I like to measure both when doing application benchmarks. Template systems tend to be heavy CPU consumers for webapps, which is why I include them. >> None of the apps I've benchmarked are negatively impacted. I only have >> two minor comments. Please commit this. > > Before committing I want to know what to do with the new jump opcodes, > with respect to the alternative proposal I've made in #4715. > Ideally, I should fold the #4715 patch back into the present patch, > since I think the #4715 approach is more thought out. That sounds good, especially since Jeffrey and I have already reviewed #4715. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2459> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
