Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > I feel like if we are to implement this, we should let the developer choose > the separator and not limit to just `&` and `;`
That doesn’t feel necessary to me. I suspect most links use &, some use ;, nothing else is valid at the moment and I don’t expect a new separator to suddenly appear. IMO the boolean parameter to also recognize ; was better. > but that discussion probably belongs in the PR. PR discussions are generally about how to achieve the goal (fix or new feature) and quality of implementation, but tickets is where we agree on what the goal is and how to fix it (big picture). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42967> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
