Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
See also #10562. Conceivably, we could add support for `i` on parsing (along with adding `cmath.infi` and `cmath.nanj`). We can probably also find a way to extend the format specification to allow use of `i` in place of `j` on output. The harder problem would be changing the repr and str of complex without breaking existing code. I doubt that the OP would be satisfied with the following: >>> 3 + 4i (3+4j) ---------- nosy: +mark.dickinson _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43025> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
