Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: I can't understand problem number 1 either. I suspect it is a misunderstanding by the poster, since he is talking about a "destructor of the c++ based library" and there's no c++ code in the interpreter.
As for number 2, it is a legitimate feature request. However, since the current Timer class is very inefficient (one separate thread for each timer), it would make sense to rephrase it as a more general suggestion to re-implement the Timer class using a single background thread and a heapq-based priority queue. It would be a good project for someone wanting to start contributing to the interpreter. ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue995907> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
