Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks, Georg. And yes, I was indeed wondering why I found so few wayward
apostrophes!
Applied in r69846, r69847. I'm not sure whether it's worth backporting
these to 2.6 and 3.0.
> Please do not change builtin to built-in. In a python context, it reads
> fine as one word.
"built-in" seems to be the more common spelling within the documentation.
Personally, in the context of Python I find "builtin" acceptable as a noun
("don't shadow builtins"), but it still looks wrong when used as an
adjective ("the builtin function open"). Anyway, I'll refrain from making
any more of these changes.
----------
resolution: accepted -> fixed
status: open -> closed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5341>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
