Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> added the comment:
I'm very much of the practicality beats purity philosophy, so I want to support the OP's flag without making them jump through hoops. On the flip side, I also appreciate that there are folks that want the extra security... So here's my plan: remove the creation time check (which will remove the error for the OP), and then add a decorator to the enum module that does that creation time check -- just like the `unique` decorator enforces no aliases. Now I just need a good name for that decorator: - complete ? - exhaustive ? - all_named ? - check_for_unnamed ? ---------- assignee: -> ethan.furman _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44242> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
