Steven D'Aprano <steve+pyt...@pearwood.info> added the comment:
This is not a bug, it is intentional design and has been since Python 1. You are incorrect about x consuming memory "always". If the value bound to x is in use elsewhere, deleting x will save no memory. If the value is not in use elsewhere, it will be garbage collected as soon as x goes out of scope, which will be at the end of the function. Shifting to block-scope for for-loops has been discussed before, it is not a popular idea and I expect that most people will oppose it. You can search the Python-Ideas mailing list if you want to find out more. If you still feel strongly that this is an enhancement, as it is a major change in language behaviour it would require a PEP to be written. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/ Even if the PEP was accepted, the earliest it could go into the language would be Python 3.11 or better, and that would likely require a special `__future__` import. ---------- nosy: +steven.daprano resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44332> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
