Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com> added the comment:
I agree this should be closed (and I'm closing it). I don't see any reason why this function should do something other than raise TypeError if given bs=None. If you want that behavior, write a small wrapper function. The "if not bs" check appears to be an optimization for the case of zero-length input. Hopefully the code would continue to work without that test (or instead testing for len(bs)==0), but in my opinion it's not worth the risk of removing or changing it. ---------- stage: -> resolved status: pending -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44520> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
