Robert <kxrobe...@gmail.com> added the comment:

You see the usecase from the stack trace: PythonWin (the IDE from pywin32 
package) uses pyclbr - to inspect arbitrary user code.  
(Neither code is from me)

I'm not inspecting __main__ explicitely. The problem seems to arise in newer 
Python versions (3.10+?) because the class browser now seems to parse imports 
somehow recursively (_readmodule() several times in the stack trace) and when 
user code somewhere contains e.g. "import __main__" ...


pyclbr should perhaps handle (not fail in) all legal cases w/o breaking: when 
some strange builtin/extension/artificial has .__spec__ as None or not set or 
no python code. (We cannot force any user code to monkey patch 
__main__.__spec__ or potential other modules.)

>>> mod = types.ModuleType('mymod')
>>> mod.__spec__
# (None)
>>> 

importlib.util._find_spec_from_path() has choosen to raise ValueError instead 
of an extra custom Error (or a special return value) for those cases and to 
return None for the similar case of 'not found') . Though those 3 cases are 
similiar in consequence here.  pyclbr also "cheaply abuses" ImportError / 
ModuleNotFound to translate one of those cases (None return value) for internal 
signaling. (There is never a real ImportError just remote linguistic similarity 
;-) ) 

Hence the simple pragmatic fix by kind of reunification of signaling the "end 
of the game" here - as the way of signaling here is anyway rather pragmatic and 
evolution style.

ValueError is often (ab)used to signal application level errors "cheaply" (to 
not define and distribute an extra Exception type) - and its a limited internal 
case here where mix-up with errors from something like "math.sqrt(-1)" is not 
possible w/o coding bugs (which are to be detected by tests)

But you may establish a more meticulous error / return value signaling system - 
which though will require changes / refactoring in several places and 
consideration for compatibility ...
(Think its hardly worth it)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43299>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to