Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> do you feel like that new article is a good drop-in replacement for the old > one? No really, no. :-( I also now see that the new article has a (broken) link to the old article, which makes me think that maybe the removal of the old article was unintentional. We should probably find a way to report this upstream. I think I'd go for dropping the existing broken Mozilla URL and then possibly looking for other good sources. Perhaps solicit suggestions on discuss.python.org? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44830> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
