Filipe Laíns <la...@riseup.net> added the comment:

distutils will install the headers to 
{base}/include/python{py_version_short}{abiflags}/{dist_name}, and I think 
probably the best option would be to do the same. So, I think we could add a 
site-include scheme like I described and have the installers append a directory 
with the distribution name to it.

I think it would be reasonable to put all headers in a shared directory, 
site-include, given that we make sure the installers put them in a subdirectory 
for each distribution.

About standardizing pkg-config-like metadata, I don't think that's a great 
idea, as it would not replace the mechanisms you mentioned. It might replace 
some, but not all, as there could always be a use-case that needs more 
information or interaction than what our standard may provide.

Does this make sense to you?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44445>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to