Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> added the comment:
> You are far better and more experienced in maintaining widely used opensource > codebases so I wouldn't argue with you, but... :) Well, if a change introduces a problem, it will be my lookout, won't it? Just as the original patch for bpo-8117 is proving to be :-) OK, how about this? We update the PR to add a new use_ctime=False keyword argument to TimedRotatingHandler.__init__(). If nothing else changes, the behaviour is as it is currently. If use_ctime=True is passed in the instantiation, then the constructor will use CTIME rather than MTIME. Will that work for you? I'd be OK with that approach. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40469> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
