Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> GH-27772 reverts the behaviour change but keeps the fix for the undefined > behaviour. Can the backport of GH-27772 to the 3.10 branch go in before > 3.10.0 final? Thanks for checking with me! Given that this is fixing a bug that we introduced in rc1, I think it makes sense to backport to fix it. I have reviewed the code in GH-27772 and is contained enough, so I think is a good idea to go ahead. Thanks Mark for all the work! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44698> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
