Antony Lee <anntzer....@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I'm not convinced that operator.caller() would be useful to me. To be clear, as noted above, I have realized that the semantics I initially proposed (now known as "caller") are not particularly useful; the semantics I am proposing (and implementing in the linked PR) are `call(f, *args, **kwargs) == f(*args, **kwargs)`. > I don't see how operator.caller() implements an existing "intrinsic operators > of Python". Agreed; on the other hand function calling is much more intrinsic(?!) > Can't you use functools.partial() for that? How do you propose to do that? Perhaps I am missing an easy solution... ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44019> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
