Ned Deily <n...@python.org> added the comment:
Thanks for the updates! >If the core developers say various cross-compiling scenarios aren't supported >build configuration any more, I'll accept that and work around the limitation >on my end. However, do note there is a significant possibility that Apple >stops selling Intel machines for various product models in a few weeks. I >suspect various people will want to continue their practice of building x86_64 >only binaries for the indefinite future. I think you make very good points. I also think that we all agree that we do need to work towards better supporting the coming primarily non-Intel Mac world. I would rather put it that there are cross-compiling scenarios that were never supported before (but also not necessarily fully documented as such) but may have worked coincidentally some of the time; moving forward, we need to identify the important scenarios and make sure we fully support them. We're not there yet but I have some ideas on how to do that which I will try to get written down soon. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44689> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
