Ken Jin <kenjin4...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Like what Ma Lin and neonene have mentioned above, PR28475 recovered half of the lost performance. It's unfortunately still 4% slower than 3.10a7. >pyperf compare_to 310a7.json 310rc2.json 310rc2patched.json Geometric mean (versus 3.10a7) ============== 310rc2: 1.09x slower 310rc2patched: 1.04x slower Attached pyperf benchmark comparisons file. ---------- Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file50293/PR28475_vs_310rc2_vs_310a7.txt _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45116> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
