Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> added the comment:
I considered just switching to <2.0, but wasn't sure if I would be breaking some other unspoken behaviour there. But you're right, it's really just detecting underflow vs. overflow, so that's a much simpler way to check. I've filed the upstream report. I suspect the errno is coming from the exp() call within the expm1() implementation, so it's underflowing towards 0.0 and then subtracting 1. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46018> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
