Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> added the comment:
> My understanding of the resolution of this ticket is that it is still not > possible to use setrlimit with RLIMIT_STACK to raise the soft stack limit. > Is that correct? Yes, the code in msg324731 still fails. We're still using the mechanism described in msg324818, but with a larger stack size for some builds. It is rather annoying that -Wl,-stack_size,NNNN sets a hard limit on the stack size, rather than overriding the soft limit. I guess we could change the startup code for the interpreter executable (Py_Main or related code) to set the RLIMIT_STACK to a larger value when it is too small, that way applications can still pick a different (and in particular larger) value. @ned.deily, @lukasz.langa: reopen this issue or open a new one? ---------- versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.11 -Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34602> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
