Andre Roberge <andre.robe...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> This also affects 3.9 I imagine, no? Yes. And, from what I can tell, the same incorrect line is indicated at least all the way back to Python 3.6 (where it was "invalid token" instead of "invalid decimal literal). ---------- nosy: +aroberge _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46237> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
