New submission from yota moteuchi <yota.n...@gmail.com>:
This improvement proposal is close to : https://bugs.python.org/issue42956 and also detailed in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13855288/turn-slice-into-range to iterate over a slice, the recommended method seems to be : s = slice(5,100,3) for i in range(s.stop)[s] : # do something but if range() accepted directly a slice, it would dramatically improve the readability : s = slice(5,100,3) for i in range(s) : # do something and it could be convenient, especially inside the __getitem__ property. I'll try to make a quick patch to test... ---------- messages: 410143 nosy: yota moteuchi priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: range() function could accept slice() objects as parameters type: enhancement versions: Python 3.11 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46312> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
