Alex Waygood <alex.wayg...@gmail.com> added the comment: I agree with Inada that not every internal type should be exposed, but I would make an exception for the dict views classes due to the fact that dict subclasses are much more common than subclasses of other mappings, such as OrderedDict. I don't think it's *particularly* important to expose the OrderedDict views classes in the same way.
Adding the "mapping" attribute to KeysView/ValuesView/ItemsView seems like it could be quite disruptive — there may be a lot of third-party users with classes that inherit from those, who'd need to make changes to their code. From a typing perspective, it would also mean that KeysView and ValuesView would have to be parameterised with two TypeVars (key-type and value-type), whereas now they both only take one (KeysView is parameterised with the key-type, ValuesView with the value-type). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46399> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
