Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment:
If we want this feature to stay in, it needs an implementation that does not rely on a multithreaded processing calling fork(). I'm going to have to revert the existing implementation for bpo-46464. ---------- stage: resolved -> needs patch status: closed -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44733> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
