Eddie Elizondo <eduardo.elizondoru...@gmail.com> added the comment:
It seems that we are back on track with perf being back to neutral! I've created 4 new PRs. Each with an optimization applied on top of the baseline introduction of instance immortalization. The main PR 19474 currently stands at around 4%, after rebasing past Eric's PR 30928 it went down to 3%. This is the list of optimizations that I used to get some performance back: * Immortalizing Interned Strings (PR 31488): 1% regression * Immortalizing Runtime Heap After Startup (PR 31489): 0% regression * Immortalizing Modules After Import (PR 31490): 1% regression * Combined Optimizations (PR 31491): 0% improvement All the PRs contain the results of the pyperformance benchmarks and they should each stand on their own in case we want to go for a subset of these optimizations rather than all of them. Make sure to look at each PR to read the implementation details. For testing, in every PR I made sure all the tests were passing on my local environment. Though I do expect some failures happening in non-linux environments. I'll be fixing these over the next couple of days. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40255> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
