Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
The link https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder/blob/cinder/3.8/Python/ceval.c#L6617 points to something that I wouldn't associate with the subject. @Dino, could you provide a new link (preferably a permalink)? FWIW rather than dynamically checking what the next opcode is, maybe we could use a super-instruction for CALL + GET_AWAITABLE? (Understanding that there are a bunch of different CALL opcodes.) The gather code you link to is all in C. Is rewriting gather in C the only way to benefit from this speedup? (I guess you could just add your gather impl to the existing _asynciomodule.c, in the same or a separate PR.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46965> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
