Julien Palard <julien+pyt...@palard.fr> added the comment:
> Since you seem to be challenging the value of 999999999, my question to you > is, why do you care what the refcount of 1 is? Yesterday I was teaching Python, and we were speaking of integer immutability, names being "labels to objects" and so on, and I was showing the memory layout of all of this by hand on a whiteboard while "prooving" my drawings using an interpreter. While doing so came a question like "So, many modules can use the object int(1)?" So I answered yes, told that I expected many reuse of 1, and went importing sys.getrefcount to show them. And boom, it printed 1000000209 so I bugged for a few seconds, the value was obviously not the real refcount, and was also obviously bumped by a constant like 100000000, so I went inspecting why and found this commit. I have nothing against keeping 999999999, but in the other hand it could surprise other people, maybe we should at least document it near sys.getrefcount. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45953> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
