Wang Chun <yaohua2...@gmail.com> added the comment: This is my test on another faster machine.
$ cat test.py import sys, time, uuid N = int(sys.argv[1]) t = time.time() for x in xrange(N): uuid.uuid1() print('%.3f microseconds' % ((time.time() - t) * 1000000.0 / N)) $ cat test.c #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/time.h> #include <uuid/uuid.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int i, n; double t1, t2; uuid_t uuid; struct timeval t; struct timezone tz; sscanf(argv[1], "%d", &n); gettimeofday(&t, &tz); t1 = (double)t.tv_sec + (double)t.tv_usec / 1000000.0; for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { uuid_generate_time(uuid); } gettimeofday(&t, &tz); t2 = (double)t.tv_sec + (double)t.tv_usec / 1000000.0; printf("%.3f microseconds\n", (t2 - t1) * 1000000.0 / n); return 0; } $ gcc -l uuid -o test test.c $ python test.py 50000 25.944 microseconds $ python test.py 200000 25.810 microseconds $ python test.py 1000000 25.865 microseconds $ ./test 50000 0.214 microseconds $ ./test 200000 0.214 microseconds $ ./test 1000000 0.212 microseconds $ ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5885> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com