Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment: > I was hoping this would make 3.1. Too late, I guess. What about 3.2?
Here's what I said before: """ I think we should either get this into the 3.0a5 release planned for May 7, or wait for 3.1. I'd prefer to see some kind of PEP discussion on the python-3000 list, rather than just a BDFL approval in a tracker issue. I think it's a useful feature (especially now we already have PEP 3132) but we're getting close to the release, so I'd like to see some more eyeballs on this code... I expect the PEP discussion will be short and sweet -- either most folks like it, or we should not push through at this point in time. """ I still think this is the way to do it. I'm +0 myself. We might decide not to do it just because py3k needs stability more than it needs more features. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
