New submission from Chris Rebert <pyb...@rebertia.com>:

>From what I've seen on several c.l.p threads, some people have a tough
time figuring the correct 'args' argument to subprocess.Popen's
constructor. In an effort to cut down on such discussions in the future,
I've written the attached docs patch to better explain the subject.

I'm not an rst/Sphinx guru and thus was unable to actually test the
patch, so there might be some (hopefully minor) formatting errors.

----------
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
files: subprocess.rst.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 91859
nosy: cvrebert, georg.brandl
severity: normal
status: open
title: patch to subprocess docs to better explain Popen's 'args' argument
versions: Python 2.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14770/subprocess.rst.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6760>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to