Jason R. Coombs <jar...@jaraco.com> added the comment: Thanks to some hints by eric.smith, I've run the regression tests with this patch applied. It turns out there are still some outstanding issues with draft 9.
One issue was in test_glob.py where broken symlinks would fail to be matched by glob. This was due to the fact that lexists still needed to be implemented in ntpath.py. Draft 10 includes this capability. Another problem the regression tests elicited is more insidious. The patch breaks test_os.test_1686475, which references issue1686475. The new symlink-aware stat must traverse symlinks. Unfortunately, the current method of resolving the symlink target (as recommended by Microsoft) fails to work if the symlink target is in use (or otherwise a handle cannot be obtained). Unfortunately, it's not possible to call GetFinalPathNameByHandle without a handle, the same way as issue1686475 was addressed by using a different API call. I'm still devising a workaround for this undesirable behavior, but I wanted to report that progress is still being made and I wanted to capture the intermediate patch for posterity. Stay tuned for more info. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15100/windows symlink draft 10.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
