Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I have always tried to be very conservative with backporting stuff that > is not clearly a bugfix but alters any kind of behaviour. I am always > very concerned about compatibility, especially if code has been around > for as long as this code has. > But as I don't want to waste anybody's time with a lengthy discussion, > just say a word and I apply it to 2.6 and 3.1 as well ;-)
What if I say chocolate? Regardless, I think you should backport it at least to 3.1, and that it makes sense to backport it to 2.6 too. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7341> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
