Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment: Gregory P. Smith wrote: > > Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment: > > lemburg - see which issue #?
Sorry, the message got truncated for some reason. I was referring to http://bugs.python.org/issue3745 This was discussed on python-dev: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-December/094593.html > Anyways perhaps the right thing to do instead of trunk r65961 would have > been to change the s# to an s*. That would have worked as well. > Undoing it will be more painful now as several changes have gone in since > that require undoing and possibly redoing differently. Using s* should pretty much avoid the need to use GET_BUFFER_VIEW_OR_ERROUT(), so if you want to keep the other changes, removing the use of the macro should be fairly straight-forward, unless I'm missing something. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3745> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
