lekma <lekma...@gmail.com> added the comment: > lekma, do you have a real name that we should add to the ACKS file? no, lekma is fine (that's a nick I carry since childhood)
> Looking at it again, there's the question of accept() behaviour. [...] Sorry for not having seen that earlier and thanks for pointing it out to me. Unfortunately, I don't think there is a portable solution. We could restrict the patch to linux 2.6.28 and above (there is already an awful lot of ifdefs in this file). If you think that's the way to go, I can rework the patch, otherwise I think it's better to close the issue (maybe reopen when bsds catch up, if ever). Ideas? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7523> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
