R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: I see. I agree with Nick, a public API function in Warnings is better than something specific to optparse or argparse. If the op (or anyone else) wants to propose a patch to create such an API (with docs and tests), that would be welcome. The docs for that API could then include the recipe for using it with argparse.
---------- nosy: +ncoghlan priority: low -> normal title: warnings could provide a pre-filled -W option for third-party tools -> warnings should provide a public API for accessing its option parsing code _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7976> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
