Jesús Cea Avión <j...@jcea.es> added the comment:

I have spend a few hours trying to understand the issue deeply, and I have an 
easier to understand version. It is bigger, but explain the issue good enough 
to use in a production program.

Please, Florent, review. It pass the leak test.

I rather prefer this patch because the weak references were sort of magic, and 
this new code actually shows what you should use in production.

If you think the patch is OK, it will be integrated in pybsddb 4.8.4 and then 
backported for python 2.7.

I also solved an undesired coupling between Replication Manager and Base 
Replication testsuites.

----------
Added file: 
http://bugs.python.org/file16537/issue7808_bsddb3_refleak_v2TOv3.diff

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7808>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to