Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amaur...@gmail.com> added the comment: On Windows, time_t is 64bit, but various functions convert it to a 32bit long. Attached patch uses time_t instead of long in various places, this fixes the proposed test.
Martin, do you think it's a viable approach? If so, I'll go and add some tests for the modified functions. ---------- keywords: +patch nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, loewis Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16725/timet_64.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8278> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
