Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: >> Are you sure this doesn't get optimized away in practice ? > > I'm sure it doesn't get optimized away by gcc 4.3, where I tested it. :)
Did you mean to include the hunk from msg105295 as part of the patch? If so, wouldn't that defeat the whole point of the patch? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8654> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
