Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> Could you provide some reasoning for such a resolution? > I had thought that "won't fix" indicated that the issue > wasn't actually an error in behavior. No, that would be "invalid." IMO, "won't fix" is for bugs were cost of fixing them outweighs the benefits. Here is a typical example: issue8309 "Sin(x) is Wrong". Here, however I am torn between "won't fix" and "invalid." As I said in my previous comment: """ Note, however that the problematic behavior is due to D/DT classes implementor's choice not to derive DT from D. Whether resulting violation of the symmetry of equality is a bug in python or D/DT implementation is at least an open question. """ I don't mind keeping this open if there is a hope that someone will come up with a working solution. The current patch is not a solution. ---------- priority: normal -> low stage: -> needs patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5516> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
