Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:

This wouldn't be the first time reproduceability is dropped, since reading from 
the docs:

“As an example of subclassing, the random module provides the WichmannHill 
class that implements an alternative generator in pure Python. The class 
provides a backward compatible way to reproduce results from earlier versions 
of Python, which used the Wichmann-Hill algorithm as the core generator.”

Also:

> FWIW, we spent ten years maintaining the ability to reproduce
> sequences.  It has become an implicit promise.

IMO it should either be documented explicitly, or be taken less dearly. There's 
not much value in an "implicit promise" that's only known by a select few.

(besides, as Terry said, I think most people are more concerned by the quality 
of the random distribution than by the reproduceability of sequences)

----------
nosy: +pitrou

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9025>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to