R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: It is true that your proposed feature would provide a way for a programmer to manually resolve the cycle issue; however, the open issue in the pep is how to do this automatically.
But if you hold on to the traceback reference, you should *expect* all those values to persist, so that shouldn't be "surprising". I repeat my recommendation that you take this to python-ideas for feedback, and then work on a patch if the feedback is positive. (By the way, I checked with a twisted developer, and what he wanted was a convenient way to manually create traceback objects.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1565525> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
