Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:

3.1 docs say same. For *nix, I would agree with your view of 'static', but 
perhaps MS uses a different terminology. Martin?

Or maybe the doc writer is using a local def of static simply as a terse, if 
potentially confusing, alternative to 'load-time linking'. But that could just 
be .lib linking versus .dll linking, which is crystal clear. Can you write an 
alternative paragraph or two that you think is better?

----------
nosy: +loewis, tjreedy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9086>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to