R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment:
Stefan: patch looks good to me in principle, but it looks like you made it
against 2.7, and we commit to py3k first now. The test does not work correctly
on py3k because of a bytes/string issue, but I'm not clear on why the problem
happens (I haven't looked in to it, I just observe that the test fails). And
yes I think this should go into 2.6 and 3.1 as well.
Narnie: if only we had enough manpower to handle all bugs as rapidly. Please
keep learning and help us where you can :)
As for your test...I'm not clear if you are saying Stefan's patch fixes or
problem or not, but please observe this:
>>> os.execv('/bin/bash', ['/bin/sh', 'echos', 'foo'])
/bin/sh: echos: No such file or directory
That is, it is /bin/bash that is running, but it thinks its name is '/bin/sh'
because that is what we passed in arg0 in the execv call.
Similarly you could do:
>>> os.execv('/bin/bash', ['my_funny_walk', 'echos', 'foo'])
my_funny_walk: echos: No such file or directory
So, popen is *calling* the correct shell, it's just that it is giving it the
wrong arg[0] name, which Stefan's patch fixes.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9265>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
