Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Adding issue7989 as a dependency because one of the stated reasons for not calling system strftime from datetime directly is because pure python implementations cannot do the same. This of course can be resolved by exposing raw strftime in separate module (for example _time), but simply applying this patch before #7989 would mean that year < 1900 would have to be disabled for pure python implementation tests. ---------- stage: -> patch review superseder: -> Add pure Python implementation of datetime module to CPython _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1777412> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
