Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> added the comment: <<<< Your new patch makes perfect sense, but can you check of regular python invocation uses runpy these days. If it does, it may make sense to include it in trace at least optionally. >>>>
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. Could you please clarify? <<<< Also, does this fix the original problem? >>>> Alas, no. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9317> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
