Daniel Urban <urban.dani...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Unless there is a reason I have missed, I would iterate through the
> smaller set, which might even be empty or nearly so, rather than
> either in particular.
You're right, here is a new patch. Pseudocode:
def isdisjoint(self, other):
if self is other:
if len(self) == 0:
return True
else:
return False
else:
if len(other) > len(self):
self, other = other, self
for item in other:
if item in self:
return False
return True
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18172/issue9212a.diff
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9212>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
