Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Jean-Paul Calderone <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> added the comment: > >> I also like Antoine's idea of pickling the function/method name instead of >> the whole code object. > > I like it too. That's why I suggested it in the first comment on the ticket > (read the linked > code). I guess Alexander likes it too, since he basically said as much in > the second > comment. ;) Yes, I think we have a consensus on this point. Note, however that since unbound methods have been removed in 3.x, it is not trivial to find a fully qualified name of a method anymore. Also we need to decide where to stop: should methods of nested classes be pickleable? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9276> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
