R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment:

When I first looked at this issue, it appeared to me reading the code that the 
assumption was not considered safe.  I'm hoping I can implement something akin 
to your algorithm in email6 (which, unfortunately, won't make 3.2), but I'm 
going to have to give it a lot of thought to make sure I'm not making any 
unsafe assumptions.  So while I have this issue on my list, it won't be 
addressed in 3.2.

----------
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 2.7

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6942>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to