Andrey Vlasovskikh <andrey.vlasovsk...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> On closer look your patch is also ignoring SystemExit. I think it's > beneficial to honor SystemExit, so a user could use this as a means to > replace the current process with a new one. Yes, SystemExit should cancel all the tasks that are currently in the queue. I guess my patch doesn't handle this properly. > If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the result handler > hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is going to be > handled by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate? Yes, I think that #9205 covers this issue, so #8296 may be marked as a duplicate. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8296> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
